کارابرن عزیز، مقالات isi بالاترین کیفیت ترجمه را دارند، ترجمه آنها کامل و دقیق می باشد (محتوای جداول و شکل های نیز ترجمه شده اند) و از بهترین مجلات isi انتخاب گردیده اند. همچنین تمامی ترجمه ها دارای ضمانت کیفیت بوده و در صورت عدم رضایت کاربر مبلغ عینا عودت داده خواهد شد.
از نرم افزار winrar برای باز کردن فایل های فشرده استفاده می شود. برای دانلود آن بر روی لینک زیر کلیک کنید
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله:
A critical examination of the relationship among research, theory, and practice: Technology and reading instruction
ترجمه فارسی عنوان مقاله:
یک بررسی اساسی روی رابطه بین تحقیق، نظریه و عمل: فناوری و آموزش خواندن
Computers & Education Volume 125, October 2018, Pages 62-73
Xinyuan Yang, Li-Jen Kuo, Xuejun Ji, Erin McTigue
Recent technological advancements have changed how literacy is perceived, and it is no longer confined to the interaction with print text. The evolving definition of literacy has been reflected in the increasing number of teachers who are incorporating technology into their reading instruction. However, less is known about the extent to which these technology-integrated instructional practices are supported by reading theories. The purpose of this study is to systematically review how technology has been implemented in reading instruction and to explore how transitions of instructional practice from traditional classrooms to digital settings have been grounded in reading theories. The present study reviewed articles published over the past twelve years in flagship practitioner journals to examine the connections and the gaps between theory and practice. Our review uncovered that technology has served in reading instruction primarily in three ways: 1) to increase reading motivation, 2) to present information in multi-modalities, and 3) to promote collaborative learning. Consistent with other domains of reading instruction, social theories were found to be the prominent theoretical bases supporting technology-integrated practices; dual-coding theory has also emerged in recent years as the theoretical basis for technology use in reading instruction. However, most of the theories were rarely referred explicitly. Implications for researchers and practitioners were provided based on the gaps between theory and practice revealed in the current review.
keywords: Technology |Reading instruction |Digital literacy |Theory and practice |Systematic review
توضیحات اضافی: نظر