دانلود مقاله انگلیسی رایگان:نابرابری  قوانین در محل کار و استعمال دخانیات در کالیفرنیا: تجزیه و تحلیل اپیدمیولوژیک قانونی بسته شدن حفره - 2020
بلافاصله پس از پرداخت دانلود کنید
دانلود مقاله انگلیسی حقوق عمومی رایگان
  • Inequity in California’s Smokefree Workplace Laws: A Legal Epidemiologic Analysis of Loophole Closures Inequity in California’s Smokefree Workplace Laws: A Legal Epidemiologic Analysis of Loophole Closures
    Inequity in California’s Smokefree Workplace Laws: A Legal Epidemiologic Analysis of Loophole Closures

    سال انتشار:

    2020


    عنوان انگلیسی مقاله:

    Inequity in California’s Smokefree Workplace Laws: A Legal Epidemiologic Analysis of Loophole Closures


    ترجمه فارسی عنوان مقاله:

    نابرابری قوانین در محل کار و استعمال دخانیات در کالیفرنیا: تجزیه و تحلیل اپیدمیولوژیک قانونی بسته شدن حفره


    منبع:

    Sciencedirect - Elsevier - American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 58 (2020) e71-e78: doi:10:1016/j:amepre:2019:10:011


    نویسنده:

    Judith J. Prochaska, PhD, MPH,1 Maya Hazarika Watts, JD,2 Leslie Zellers, JD,2 Darlene Huang, JD, MPH,2 Eric Jay Daza, DrPH,1 Joseph Rigdon, PhD,3 Melissa J. Peters, MPH,2 Lisa Henriksen, PhD1


    چکیده انگلیسی:

    Introduction: California’s landmark 1994 Smokefree Workplace Act contained numerous exemptions, or loopholes, believed to contribute to inequities in smokefree air protections among lowincome communities and communities of color (e.g., permitting smoking in warehouses, hotel common areas). Cities/counties were not prevented from adopting stronger laws. This study coded municipal laws and state law changes (in 2015−2016) for loophole closures and determined their effects in reducing inequities in smokefree workplace protections. Methods: Public health attorneys reviewed current laws for 536 of California’s 539 cities and counties from January 2017 to May 2018 and coded for 19 loophole closures identified from legislative actions (inter-rater reliability, 87%). The local policy data were linked with population demographics from intercensal estimates (2012−2016) and adult smoking prevalence (2014). The analyses were cross-sectional and conducted in February−June 2019. Results: Between 1994 and 2018, jurisdictions closed 6.09 loopholes on average (SD=5.28). Urban jurisdictions closed more loopholes than rural jurisdictions (mean=6.40 vs 3.94, p<0.001), and loophole closure scores correlated positively with population size, median household income, and percentage white, non-Hispanic residents (p<0.001 for all). Population demographics and the loophole closure score explained 43% of the variance in jurisdictions’ adult smoking prevalence. State law changes in 2015−2016 increased loophole closure scores and decreased jurisdiction variation (mean=9.74, SD=3.56); closed more loopholes in rural versus urban jurisdictions (meangain=4.44 vs 3.72, p=0.002); and in less populated, less affluent jurisdictions, with greater racial/ethnic diversity, and higher smoking prevalence (p<0.001 for all). Conclusions: Although jurisdictions made important progress in closing loopholes in smokefree air law, state law changes achieved greater reductions in inequities in policy coverage. Am J Prev Med 2020;58(3):e71−e78. © 2019 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.


    سطح: متوسط
    تعداد صفحات فایل pdf انگلیسی: 8
    حجم فایل: 455 کیلوبایت

    قیمت: رایگان


    توضیحات اضافی:




اگر این مقاله را پسندیدید آن را در شبکه های اجتماعی به اشتراک بگذارید (برای به اشتراک گذاری بر روی ایکن های زیر کلیک کنید)

تعداد نظرات : 0

الزامی
الزامی
الزامی
rss مقالات ترجمه شده rss مقالات انگلیسی rss کتاب های انگلیسی rss مقالات آموزشی
logo-samandehi