دانلود مقاله انگلیسی رایگان:تفسیر نتیجه گیری پزشکی قانونی توسط متخصصان دادرسی کیفری: همان شواهد متفاوت تفسیر می شود - 2020
بلافاصله پس از پرداخت دانلود کنید
دانلود مقاله انگلیسی حقوق خصوصی رایگان
  • The interpretation of forensic conclusions by criminal justice professionals: The same evidence interpreted differently The interpretation of forensic conclusions by criminal justice professionals: The same evidence interpreted differently
    The interpretation of forensic conclusions by criminal justice professionals: The same evidence interpreted differently

    سال انتشار:

    2020


    عنوان انگلیسی مقاله:

    The interpretation of forensic conclusions by criminal justice professionals: The same evidence interpreted differently


    ترجمه فارسی عنوان مقاله:

    تفسیر نتیجه گیری پزشکی قانونی توسط متخصصان دادرسی کیفری: همان شواهد متفاوت تفسیر می شود


    منبع:

    Sciencedirect - Elsevier - Forensic Science International, 313 (2020) 110331. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110331


    نویسنده:

    Elmarije K. van Straalena,b,*, Christianne J. de Poota,b,c, Marijke Malschd, Henk Elffersd


    چکیده انگلیسی:

    Forensic reports use various types of conclusions, such as a categorical (CAT) conclusion or a likelihood ratio (LR). In order to correctly assess the evidence, users of forensic reports need to understand the conclusion and its evidential strength. The aim of this paper is to study the interpretation of the evidential strength of forensic conclusions by criminal justice professionals. In an online questionnaire 269 professionals assessed 768 reports on fingerprint examination and answered questions that measured self-proclaimed and actual understanding of the reports and conclusions. The reports entailed CAT, verbal LR and numerical LR conclusions with low or high evidential strength and were assessed by crime scene investigators, police detectives, public prosecutors, criminal lawyers, and judges. The results show that about a quarter of all questions measuring actual understanding of the reports were answered incorrectly. The CAT conclusion was best understood for the weak conclusions, the three strong conclusions were all assessed similarly. The weak CAT conclusion correctly emphasizes the uncertainty of any conclusion type used. However, most participants underestimated the strength of this weak CAT conclusion compared to the other weak conclusion types. Looking at the self-proclaimed understanding of all professionals, they in general overestimated their actual understanding of all conclusion types.
    Keywords: Forensic conclusions | Criminal justice professionals | Evidence interpretation | Strength of evidence | Communicating uncertainty


    سطح: متوسط
    تعداد صفحات فایل pdf انگلیسی: 11
    حجم فایل: 562 کیلوبایت

    قیمت: رایگان


    توضیحات اضافی:




اگر این مقاله را پسندیدید آن را در شبکه های اجتماعی به اشتراک بگذارید (برای به اشتراک گذاری بر روی ایکن های زیر کلیک کنید)

تعداد نظرات : 0

الزامی
الزامی
الزامی
rss مقالات ترجمه شده rss مقالات انگلیسی rss کتاب های انگلیسی rss مقالات آموزشی
logo-samandehi