دانلود مقاله انگلیسی رایگان:شهادت متخصص سلامت روان پزشکی قانونی و تصمیم گیری قضایی: یک بررسی ادبیات سیستماتیک - 2020
بلافاصله پس از پرداخت دانلود کنید
دانلود مقاله انگلیسی حقوق خصوصی رایگان
  • Forensic mental health expert testimony and judicial decision-making: A systematic literature review Forensic mental health expert testimony and judicial decision-making: A systematic literature review
    Forensic mental health expert testimony and judicial decision-making: A systematic literature review

    سال انتشار:

    2020


    عنوان انگلیسی مقاله:

    Forensic mental health expert testimony and judicial decision-making: A systematic literature review


    ترجمه فارسی عنوان مقاله:

    شهادت متخصص سلامت روان پزشکی قانونی و تصمیم گیری قضایی: یک بررسی ادبیات سیستماتیک


    منبع:

    Sciencedirect - Elsevier - Aggression and Violent Behavior, 51 (2020) 101387. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2020.101387


    نویسنده:

    R.M.S. van Es⁎, M.J.J. Kunst, J.W. de Keijser


    چکیده انگلیسی:

    Forensic mental health expertise (FMHE) is an important source of information for decision-makers in the criminal justice system. This expertise can be used in various decisions in a criminal trial, such as criminal responsibility and sentencing decisions. Despite an increasing body of empirical literature concerning FMHE, it remains largely unknown how and to what extent this expertise affects judicial decisions. The aim of this review was therefore to provide insight in the relationship between FMHE and different judicial decisions by synthesizing published, quantitative empirical studies. Based on a systematic literature search using multiple online databases and selection criteria, a total of 27 studies are included in this review. The majority of studies were experiments conducted in the US among mock jurors. Most studies focused on criminal responsibility or sentencing decisions. Studies concerning criminal responsibility found consistent results in which psychotic defendants of serious, violent crimes were considered not guilty by reason of insanity more often than defendants with psychopathic disorders. Results for length and type of sanctions were less consistent and were often affected by perceived behavioral control, recidivism risk and treatability. Studies on possible prejudicial effects of FMHE are almost non-existent. Evaluation of findings, limitations and implications for future research and practice are discussed.
    Keywords: Forensic mental health expertise | Judicial decision-making | Review


    سطح: متوسط
    تعداد صفحات فایل pdf انگلیسی: 14
    حجم فایل: 469 کیلوبایت

    قیمت: رایگان


    توضیحات اضافی:




اگر این مقاله را پسندیدید آن را در شبکه های اجتماعی به اشتراک بگذارید (برای به اشتراک گذاری بر روی ایکن های زیر کلیک کنید)

تعداد نظرات : 0

الزامی
الزامی
الزامی
rss مقالات ترجمه شده rss مقالات انگلیسی rss کتاب های انگلیسی rss مقالات آموزشی
logo-samandehi