با سلام خدمت کاربران در صورتی که با خطای سیستم پرداخت بانکی مواجه شدید از طریق کارت به کارت (6037997535328901 بانک ملی ناصر خنجری ) مقاله خود را دریافت کنید (تا مشکل رفع گردد).
دسته بندی:
کارآفرینی - Entrepreneurship
سال انتشار:
2020
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله:
At the boundaries of institutional theorizing: Individual entrepreneurship in episodes of regulatory change
ترجمه فارسی عنوان مقاله:
در مرزهای نظریه پردازی نهادی: کارآفرینی فردی در دوره های تغییر نظارتی
منبع:
Sciencedirect - Elsevier - Accounting, Organizations and Society, 83 (2020) 101102: doi:10:1016/j:aos:2019:101102
نویسنده:
Lukas Löhlein
چکیده انگلیسی:
We analyse the institutional dynamics surrounding the establishment of independent audit oversight in
Germany from 1997 to 2016. Complementing prior works, which have focused on countries where the
global demand for independent regulation coincides with the domestic erosion of public trust in professional self-regulation, we investigate regulatory change in a context featuring strong trust in the
accounting profession. To analyse the accounting establishment’s response to expanding global standards of accounting regulation and the escalating resistance of small accounting firms, as orchestrated by
one individual, we mobilize a Bourdieusian field perspective and the literature on institutional entrepreneurship. By demonstrating how intra-professional conflict has increasingly eroded the establishment’s capital to reproduce its hegemonic field position and keep the regulator at distance, our case
provides a counterpoint to prior research, which suggests that oversight is mainly the product of negotiations between a unified profession and the regulatory authority. Examining a rare instance of individual entrepreneurship also enables us to engage in a theory-testing process on the explanatory
power of institutional ambiguitiesdthe subjectively perceived ruptures and contradictions within
established social arrangementsdfor agency. Our findings suggest that ongoing encounters with institutional ambiguities result in varying disposition to activism. In this way, while acknowledging agency as
a cause of field reproduction and change, our analysis shifts attention towards the relational, temporal,
and transformational institutional dynamics that constitute distinct modes of agency. By identifying
empirical residuals that seem to escape theorization, we also reveal the limits of institutional theorizing.
Keywords: Audit oversight | Institutional entrepreneurship | Field change | Institutional ambiguities | Institutional biography
قیمت: رایگان
توضیحات اضافی:
تعداد نظرات : 0