با سلام خدمت کاربران در صورتی که با خطای سیستم پرداخت بانکی مواجه شدید از طریق کارت به کارت (6037997535328901 بانک ملی ناصر خنجری ) مقاله خود را دریافت کنید (تا مشکل رفع گردد).
دسته بندی:
حقوق جرم و جزا - Criminal Law
سال انتشار:
2020
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله:
Patent assertion entities and the courts: Injunctive or fee-based relief?
ترجمه فارسی عنوان مقاله:
نهادهای ادعای ثبت اختراع و دادگاه ها: تخفیف غیرعلنی یا مبتنی بر هزینه؟
منبع:
Sciencedirect - Elsevier - International Review of Law & Economics, 65 (2021) 105974: doi:10:1016/j:irle:2020:105974
نویسنده:
James A. Brander
چکیده انگلیسی:
A 2006 U.S. Supreme Court decision encouraged district courts to rely more on license fees and less on
injunctions as a remedy for patent infringement. This paper provides a simple model in which a paten towning patent assertion entity(PAE) ¨ and an infringing firm engage in Nash bargaining over a possible
license fee after the PAE initiates an infringement lawsuit. We compare a fee-based regime in which the
court imposes a fair value license fee if there is no settlement with a regime in which failure to reach
a settlement leads to an injunction that disrupts production. The injunctive regime always involves a
settlement but, in a fee-based regime, settlements occur only for patents on drastic innovations (as
defined by Arrow, 1962). For small incremental innovations, PAEs prefer the injunctive regime because
negotiated license fees are higher. For higher value innovations, license fees are lower in the injunctive
regime and PAEs would prefer the fee-based regime, contrary to the presumption that injunctive regimes
necessarily favor PAEs
Keywords: License fee bargaining | Patent litigation | Patent trolls | Royalty
قیمت: رایگان
توضیحات اضافی:
تعداد نظرات : 0