با سلام خدمت کاربران در صورتی که با خطای سیستم پرداخت بانکی مواجه شدید از طریق کارت به کارت (6037997535328901 بانک ملی ناصر خنجری ) مقاله خود را دریافت کنید (تا مشکل رفع گردد).
ردیف | عنوان | نوع |
---|---|---|
1 |
The interpretation of forensic conclusions by criminal justice professionals: The same evidence interpreted differently
تفسیر نتیجه گیری پزشکی قانونی توسط متخصصان دادرسی کیفری: همان شواهد متفاوت تفسیر می شود-2020 Forensic reports use various types of conclusions, such as a categorical (CAT) conclusion or a likelihood
ratio (LR). In order to correctly assess the evidence, users of forensic reports need to understand the
conclusion and its evidential strength. The aim of this paper is to study the interpretation of the
evidential strength of forensic conclusions by criminal justice professionals. In an online questionnaire
269 professionals assessed 768 reports on fingerprint examination and answered questions that
measured self-proclaimed and actual understanding of the reports and conclusions. The reports entailed
CAT, verbal LR and numerical LR conclusions with low or high evidential strength and were assessed by
crime scene investigators, police detectives, public prosecutors, criminal lawyers, and judges. The results
show that about a quarter of all questions measuring actual understanding of the reports were answered
incorrectly. The CAT conclusion was best understood for the weak conclusions, the three strong
conclusions were all assessed similarly. The weak CAT conclusion correctly emphasizes the uncertainty of
any conclusion type used. However, most participants underestimated the strength of this weak CAT
conclusion compared to the other weak conclusion types. Looking at the self-proclaimed understanding
of all professionals, they in general overestimated their actual understanding of all conclusion types. Keywords: Forensic conclusions | Criminal justice professionals | Evidence interpretation | Strength of evidence | Communicating uncertainty |
مقاله انگلیسی |