با سلام خدمت کاربران در صورتی که با خطای سیستم پرداخت بانکی مواجه شدید از طریق کارت به کارت (6037997535328901 بانک ملی ناصر خنجری ) مقاله خود را دریافت کنید (تا مشکل رفع گردد).
ردیف | عنوان | نوع |
---|---|---|
1 |
Re-evaluating post-conviction disclosure: A case for ‘better late than never’
ارزیابی مجدد افشای محکومیت پس از محکومیت: پرونده ای برای "دیر رسیدن بهتر از هرگز نرسیدن"-2019 The recent instances of fundamental failings in pre-trial disclosure should also place systemic
procedures for post-conviction disclosure firmly in the spotlight. Drawing on the authors’ experience
of working on university miscarriage of justice projects, this paper will argue that the
UK Supreme Court decision in R v Nunn must be revisited to strengthen the duty of disclosure of
material post-trial, and to provide sanctions for authorities that fail to comply. In the current
climate of austerity, there is increasing reliance on student projects and other similar organisations
to assist appellants post-conviction; it is necessary to determine what their role should be
and what rights they might have to access material on behalf of defendants. The article concludes
by suggesting that fairness demands for consideration to be given to proposals in the “Open
Justice Charter,” which is a document drafted by several academics and practitioners in the field
of criminal appeals. Keywords: Criminal disclosure | Post-conviction disclosure | Miscarriages of justice | Innocence projects |
مقاله انگلیسی |
2 |
Post-conviction disclosure in England and Wales: Could conviction integrity units (CIUs) modelled on those in the USA be the way forward?
افشای پس از محکومیت در انگلستان و ولز: آیا واحدهای یکپارچگی محکومیت (CIU) که در ایالات متحده آمریکا الگوبرداری شده ، می توانند راهی برای پیشروی باشند؟-2019 Conviction integrity units (CIUs) operate out of a small number of prosecutors offices in the USA,
and these have since 2007 contributed to several exonerations. In England and Wales, there are
obstacles in place that prevent post-conviction disclosure for virtually anyone other than the
Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC), the body that in effect screens cases for the Court of
Appeal. The article examines whether CIUs modelled on those in the USA could be the way
forward to help those who have been wrongfully convicted. It is concluded that such units could
be useful in England and Wales, and may benefit from being run by a publicly elected post similar
to the Police and Crime Commissioners (PCCs) implemented in 2012, as this would ensure
greater democratic governance and oversight. It is further concluded that improved third party
access to post-conviction disclosure is urgently needed. Keywords: Criminal appeals | Post-conviction disclosure | Conviction integrity unit | Open justice | Wrongful conviction | Miscarriages of justice |
مقاله انگلیسی |