با سلام خدمت کاربران در صورتی که با خطای سیستم پرداخت بانکی مواجه شدید از طریق کارت به کارت (6037997535328901 بانک ملی ناصر خنجری ) مقاله خود را دریافت کنید (تا مشکل رفع گردد).
ردیف | عنوان | نوع |
---|---|---|
1 |
Judicial attitudes under shifting jurisprudence: Evidence from Brazils new drug law of 2006
نگرش های قضایی تحت تغییر رویه قضایی: شواهدی از قانون جدید مواد مخدر برزیل در سال 2006-2020 This paper attempts to quantify the response of different types of appellate judges to a major shift in
criminal jurisprudence on drug offenses in Brazil, which, in 2010, revoked the prohibition of conversion
of prison sentences in drug offenses. Appellate judges may react to criminal reform by changing their
rates of judgements that are favorable to defendants and, depending on the judge type, responses run
in different directions and with variable intensity. This study offers detailed estimates of such responses
and interprets them in the light of the literature on the determinants of judicial decision-making, which
resorts not only on legal factors but also on the ideology, personal attributes and strategic behavior
of judges. According to the Brazilian constitution, 10% of the seats in appellate courts must be filled
by formerly practicing lawyers and 10% by former prosecutors, both by executive appointment. The
remaining 80% are reserved for career judges. In addition to these appointments, appellate panels also
rely heavily on judges sitting by designation, who acted as rapporteurs, between 2009 and 2013, in as
many as 14% of all criminal appeals in the state court of São Paulo, which is the subject of the analysis. A
large dataset of criminal appeals related to drug offenses and the exogenous assignment of cases allow
identifying the causal effects of career backgrounds on the response of appellate judges to the shift in
drug jurisprudence. Estimates of the effect of judge types on appellate case outcomes, conditional on case
characteristics and judging panel-specific effects, confirm that career judges are more likely to rule in
favor of defendants, in line with the shift in jurisprudence. Former prosecutors and sitting judges seem
to react against the shift, by increasing their rate of rulings against defendants. Former lawyers tend to
exhibit mixed behavior, possibly resulting from a combination of liberal attitudes and strategic behavior,
in deference to policy preferences of the executive branch. Keywords: Judicial decision making | Attitudinal model | Judicial bias | Criminal appeals | Judges sitting by designation | Selection of disputes for litigation |
مقاله انگلیسی |